Faced with barrage of bipartisan criticism over press conference with Putin, US president says he accepts intelligence agencies’ conclusion that Moscow interfered in 2016 election
— Read on www.timesofisrael.com/trump-backtracks-after-uproar-says-he-misspoke-on-russian-meddling/
So does this mean a single word turns a press conference at which nothing happens but words are said into ‘treason’ or ‘not treason’? I find it interesting he again points out there was ‘no collusion’, which is of course the point he was likely trying to make, but people conflate ‘Russian meddling’ with ‘Trump campaign collusion with Russia’ when the evidence points to the former but there’s nothing about the latter except that people hope he colluded so they can remove him from office.
jomi: playing with perception 