I’ve been working on relaxing the eye muscles inside my brain. It’s showing results: I can type and read and correct this without wearing glasses. Not long ago, the words would have been so blurry I could not trust I was typing correctly, couldn’t see to make corrections easily, and found myself distracted by not only those difficulties but my brain had to spend more visible effort on tracking my typing, checking it and so on. This caused a big slowdown in typing speed as I assigned a high value to minimizing repair time, and the slower speed plus the worry attributes pulled me away from the best directional threads of thought.
One of the hardest exercises has been shifting focus separate from eye movement,meaning that I keep my gaze as fixed in orientation as I can and shift my conscious perspective around whatever is in the frame. I do this across objects,t o and from objects, into the image and out , all so the structure behind all these excursions has remained centered where it was. That connects all the objects which can be seen in a stable frame to the origin. This may be the clearest way I’ve found to describe my work: I render the reality of the pictures in your head as they relate to the reality of you in context.
The process with my eyes mirrors the process I’ve been following across myself with good results. The tensioning of structures so they can support natural free rotation from and a round a point, and of course to a point: this generally requires identifying what needs to be relaxed, which areas need to stop hindering either free movement or movement of strength. Think frequency as freedom and wavelength as strength: the movement of a punch at high frequency requires minimizing the effects of all that slows down rapid movement to the level of force you are using. That makes it relative. In the absolute, it’s the delivery of the punch in ideal form for he highest frequency, meaning that which minimizes wavelength for your ‘robotic’ capacity. The strength portion then layers CMs so the density changes relative to the frequency measure. This means these counts, which I put in Mudi form, is the multi-dimensional counting Mudi.
I can even say what the value is. (He said confidently, hoping he’ll remember how it goes …) The gist is the visibility Mudi idealizes to the base counting Mudi bidirectionally, which phrases them as T’ Field. That T’ Field has a specific set of multi-dimensional attributes, countable so a Thing is visible as a wave or as a particle: it generates a specific combinatorial probability for any state given knowledge of pre-existing states that you treat as a present. As I remember, the value of this would be not only inverted CM64 but inverted in a specific count that treats 10^2 as a step, meaning it counts levels of CM100. It counts these levels of CM100 as layers in which there’s a count of ‘this is a layer’ and ‘this is not a layer’. That’s the LC pattern of 0-16, which I think should be even clearer with that example of the wave filling each section. Note also how you drawn threads through the layers by altering the extent to which one layer fills. A simple arrangement is ideally along the hypotenuse.
A significant consequence of working my eye muscles – or any muscle – free has been the recognition this frees up not only capacity but the recognition that I can apply that process continuously, not in one area but in any area and across related threads, so I keep getting better. I’m trying to isolate out of that the ‘learning’ spur or urge. I can see it’s a form of fall, that it’s a tip into dense areas that operate to enable the higher functions to process more efficiently and thus faster and with more reliability. Example: I realized I’d largely stopped shifting my eyes as far to the sides as I could. Doing that exercises the muscles that pull and adjust the eye,which means they get a workout, which means they both loosen up where they’ve bound and they develop tensile strength. The latter means they can hold stable positions when placed in some form of opposition, including to itself. It feel very unnatural to hold your head still while moving the eyes. But it’s a capability, meaning the body is set up to exploit that so there’s a cost to not-exploiting it. I think one reason it seems and feel odd is it’s the listener’s pose, the pose of something that doesn’t move and yet is dangerous, the pose of a predator in wait.
So I counted 16 layers of CM100 to a) count to the next visible Thing as it scales down to us. When I invert that, this gives the smallest visible Thing. That gives a value of 64 x 10^32 and 10^-34. That makes three circles of CM64. The one centered on ‘us’ and the others centered on those CM64 Endpoints. That’s one idealization, one which assigns a CM64 to each CM100 layer. That can be extended to an S + B values, so CM66.8. The match at the smallest visible Thing Endpoint is to a few parts at 10^-35 or less. I’d have to think whether I can take that apart. At the largest visible Thing Endpoint, it’s a proxy for all that is but as an instance not the entirety. It’s an idealization that rotates through to the smallest visible in a very big wave in what I call tick-tock. That gets back to the frequency / wave translation process: it occurs at the idealized bip point in the visibility (v)Mudi and then it lays out like a color shift. Stack squares and that pushes the process to the edges of the wave, so the idealization then occurs at the edge in the same manner but with different values as when in the denser region of the wave. I’m getting really close to a complete mapping of the essential processes to CMs. I recognized that inverted CM64 is the bridge into a context because that which is visible within a context is in a context. Read that twice: if it’s in the context, then it’s in the context. The proxy for that is the (v)Mudi, and the (v)Mudi counts states of Is to Not Visible bidirectionally, so Between has Endpoints B1 and B2 of wave and particle. This idealizes to the perimeter lines where Between is inverted CM64 as described, so the choice becomes binary, as exists. I hope that’s clear: when you reach the inverted CM64 level, the choice of wave or particle becomes binary because any other paths through Between can’t be described in more detail.
jomi: playing with perception 